Everything about The Two-nation Theory totally explained
The
Two-Nation Theory was the basis for the
Partition of India in 1947. It stated that
Muslims and
Hindus were two separate nations by every definition, and therefore Muslims should have an autonomous homeland in the Muslim majority areas of
British India for the safeguard of their political, cultural, and social rights, within or without a
United India.
History
The ideology of Pakistan took shape through an evolutionary process, based on historical experience. Muslim Modernist and
reformer Sir Syed Ahmad Khan began (
1817-
1898) the period of South Asian Muslim self-awakening and identity; Poet Philosopher Allama
Muhammad Iqbal (
1877-
1938), (the
poet of East), provided the philosophical explanation; and
Barrister Muhammad Ali Jinnah (
1876-
1948) translated it into the political reality of a nation state. The
All-India Muslim League, in attempting to represent Indian Muslims, felt that the Muslims of the subcontinent were a distinct and separate nation from the Hindus. At first they demanded separate electorates, but when they came to the conclusion that Muslims wouldn't be safe in a Hindu-dominated
India, they began to demand a separate state. The
League demanded
self-determination for Muslim-majority areas in the form of a sovereign state promising minorities equal rights and safeguards in these Muslim majority areas.
The evidence cited for the differences dates to the beginning of the eleventh century, when the scholar
Al-Biruni (973-1048) observed that Hindus and Muslims differed in all matters and habits.
Allama Iqbal's presidential address to the
Muslim League on
29 December 1930 is seen as the first introduction of the two-nation theory in support of what would ultimately become Pakistan. Ten years later,
Jinnah made a speech in
Lahore on
22 March,
1940 which was very similar to Al-Biruni's thesis in theme and tone. Jinnah stated that Hindus and Muslims belonged to two different religious philosophies, with different social customs and literature, with no intermarriage and based on conflicting ideas and concepts. Their outlook on life and of life was different and despite 1,000 years of history, the relations between the Hindus and Muslims couldn't attain the level of cordiality. The only difference between the writing of Al-Biruni and the speech of Jinnah was that Al-Biruni made calculated predictions, while Jinnah had history behind him to support his argument.
Support
Some right wing
Hindu leaders such as
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar endorsed the Two-Nation Theory. However, Savarkar, the leader of the
Hindu Mahasabha, believed that the new nation state of Pakistan should be formed somewhere in the
Middle East as opposed to being in the lands in which the
Vedic religion was founded and in which Hinduism thrived until the Islamic invasion.
In an
Op-Ed piece in the
Pakistan Times, Samina Mallah asserts that the Two-Nation Theory is relevant to this day, citing factors such as lower literacy and education levels amongst Indian Muslims as compared to Indian Hindus, long-standing cultural differences, and outbreaks of religious violence such as those occurring during the
2002 Gujarat Riots in
India; as well as the two
nation-states of
Bangladesh and
Pakistan as the reality of the
Two Nation Theory, although no longer part of each other yet separate from
Hindu Republic of India.
Criticism
Some historians have claimed that the theory was a creation of a few Muslim intellectuals.
Partition
Critics of the theory point to the fact that after partition, a significant minority, almost a third of the Muslims, remained in the Hindu-majority
India, whilst almost all the Hindus and Sikhs chose to leave the Muslim-majority
Pakistan and migrate to
India during the violence that accompanied partition, leaving Pakistan (after the separation of Bangladesh) today with a Hindu population of 1.5%.
Creation of Bangladesh
Critics, some in Pakistan, also point to the
Bangladesh Liberation War in 1971, as an example that a homogeneous Muslim majority may not always guarantee unity or security and that this concept was buried in the secession of
East Pakistan now
Bangladesh.
Irfan Husain, in his editorial in the Dawn observes that it has now become an "impossible and exceedingly boring task of defending a defunct theory." However some Pakistanis including
Shaukat Qadir, a retired Pakistani
Brigadier believe that the theory could only be disproved with the reunification of independent
East Bengal, and
Republic of India.
Statements and sayings
In
Muhammad Ali Jinnah All India Muslim League Presidential Address delivered at Lahore, on March 22-23,
1940, he explained:
Allama Iqbal's statement explaining the attitude of Muslim delegates to the Round-Table Conference issued in December,
1933 was a rejoinder to
Jawahar Lal Nehru's statement. Nehru had said that the attitude of the Muslim delegation was based on "reactionarism." Iqbal concluded his rejoinder with:
Further Information
Get more info on 'Two-nation Theory'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://two-nation_theory.totallyexplained.com">Two-Nation Theory Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |